An introduction

This is a semi-public place to dump text too flimsy to even become a blog post. I wouldn't recommend reading it unless you have a lot of time to waste. You'd be better off at my livejournal. I also have another blog, and write most of the French journal summaries at the Eurozine Review.

Why do I clutter up the internet with this stuff at all? Mainly because I'm trying to get into the habit of displaying as much as possible of what I'm doing in public. Also, Blogger is a decent interface for a notebook

Monday, January 31, 2011

Buxton Index

Dijkstra:
The Buxton Index of an entity, i.e. person or organization, is defined as the length of the period, measured in years, over which the entity makes its plans. For the little grocery shop around the corner it is about 1/2,for the true Christian it is infinity, and for most other entities it is in between: about 4 for the average politician who aims at his re-election, slightly more for most industries, but much less for the managers who have to write quarterly reports. The Buxton Index is an important concept because close co-operation between entities with very different Buxton Indices invariably fails and leads to moral complaints about the partner. The party with the smaller Buxton Index is accused of being superficial and short-sighted, while the party with the larger Buxton Index is accused of neglect of duty, of backing out of its responsibility, of freewheeling, etc.. In addition, each party accuses the other one of being stupid. The great advantage of the Buxton Index is that, as a simple numerical notion, it is morally neutral and lifts the difference above the plane of moral concerns.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Egypt: getaway plans

Issandr El Amrani on managing protest:

My own experience is that elite Egyptians tend to think in terms of getaway plans, because they are either deeply in bed with the regime or because they expect an uprising to become a class war

[doh: it'd be interesting to map the world in terms of how much consideration elites give to escape plans. You'd come out with some combination of physical insecurity, political insecurity, and paranoia. Who in Europe has a second passport 'just in case'? Or realy, really wants one? Almost nobody. But in Egypt? In Israel? In China?]

There has been a dramatic state failure to maintain basic health services and deliver good education. This is perhaps Egypt's biggest failure. And as in all Arab countries, autocratic political systems have de-intermediated citizens from their rulers. What I mean by this is that the channels to relay popular grievances to governments have been deeply eroded by money and power. This is dangerous, because in the end it blindsides the regimes to the popular mood, and means there are people at the local level who have the moral authority to calm the situation should there be an outburst of anger.

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Egypt link-dump

I know nothing about Egypt. Or Tunisia. Or Sudan. Or Lebanon. Or Albania. Or -- there's a lot of news happening at the moment, isn't there?

But here are some of the articles I've found about Egypt that get beyond "woo! riots!":

Al-ahram on the significance of the date:

Police Day [Jan 25] is meant to mark the day when the police forces took to the street in Ismailia to fight the British Occupation.
...
"The decision may be controversial but I think it was a good choice," says Essam El Erian, the media spokesperson of the Muslim Brotherhood, the country's largest opposition group. "Six decades ago the police did their patriotic duty and fought the British occupation, now we ask them to also fight against a corrupt government that has rigged the elections."



Marc Lynch on the Arabic media:

During the key period when the protests were picking up steam, Al Jazeera aired a documentary cultural program on a very nice seeming Egyptian novelist and musical groups, and then to sports. Now (10:30am EST) it is finally covering the protests in depth, but its early lack of coverage may hurt its credibility. I can't remember another case of Al Jazeera simply punting on a major story in a political space which it has owned.



Simon Tisdall in the Guardian

Egyptians have been here before. The so-called Cairo spring of 2005 briefly lifted hopes of peaceful reform and open elections
....
But Tuesday's large-scale protests were different in significant ways, sending unsettling signals to a regime that has made complacency a way of life. "Day of Rage" demonstrators in Cairo did not merely stand and shout in small groups, as is usual. They did not remain in one place. They joined together – and they marched. And in some cases, the police could not, or would not, stop them.
....
an ad hoc coalition of students, unemployed youths, industrial workers, intellectuals, football fans and women, connected by social media such as Twitter and Facebook, instigated a series of fast-moving, rapidly shifting demos across half a dozen or more Egyptian cities. The police could not keep up – and predictably, resorted to violence. an ad hoc coalition of students, unemployed youths, industrial workers, intellectuals, football fans and women, connected by social media such as Twitter and Facebook, instigated a series of fast-moving, rapidly shifting demos across half a dozen or more Egyptian cities. The police could not keep up – and predictably, resorted to violence.

Obligatory riot porn: Stopping a water cannon, Tiananmen-style. And something less violent

And, since they seem to be mentioned almost nowhere else, Global voices lists the demonstrators' demands


  • To raise the minimum wage limit to LE 1200 and to get an unemployment aid.

  • To cancel the emergency status in the country , to dismiss Habib El-Adly and to release all detainees without court orders.

  • Disbanding the current parliament , to have a new free election and to amend the constitution in order to have two presidential limits only.




Also, Anonymous are in the thick of it. Again. They've apparently turned LOIC on Egyptian government websites. This is after Tunisia, where they were about the first outside group to get involved. Meanwhile in Spain, having contributed to the December protests which prevented passage of an anti-download law, they're back at it as the government takes another shot at it.

It's like the gang of bored teenagers on the street corner has turned into a politicised mob.

Women, Men, and Music: the XY Factor, Part 1 | Bad Reputation

Rhian @ bad reputation:

I intellectually analyse the music I love, scouring its lyrical content and its social and cultural context for meaning to enhance my enjoyment of it, but not necessarily to justify my enjoying it in the first place. I am equally interested simply in experiencing its rhythm, its flow, its grind, its melody, the way it makes me want to move as well as the mechanics of how it achieves that, its impact on my body as well as my brain. I attach as much weight to a physical and emotional response as to a cerebral anatomising of music.


Yes, yes, yes! Probably I place far more weight on interpretation compared to Rhian, but the way she phrases things:)

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Palin schoss mit!

Reading about the connection of the Bild to Rudi Dutschke's shooting, I can't help thinking about the parallels to the Gifford shooting in the US. The anti-Springer slogan in '68 was "Bild schoss mit!". Perhaps now we need 'Palin schoss mit'?

Saturday, January 22, 2011

origin of the fourth estate

Where the term Fourth Estate comes from:
The idea of the press as a "Fourth Estate" came to prominence during the nineteenth century. In 1837 Robert Carlyle referred to "A Fourth Estate of Noble Editors" in The French Revolution: A History, and in On Heroes and Hero Worship (1841) stated that "Burke said there were Three Estates in parliament; but in the Reporters' Gallery yonder, there sat a Fourth Estate more important far than they all". Carlyle continued: "Literature is our Parliament too. Printing, which comes necessarily out of Writing, I say often, is equivalent to Democracy. Invent Writing, Democracy is inevitable."

Friday, January 21, 2011

Informational Hygiene

'Informational Hygiene' is a concept dreamt up by Neal Stephenson in his classic cyberpunk novel 'Snow Crash'. Stephenson riffs on the idea of memes as mind viruses; his conceit is that memes exist with the power not only to propagate themselves and convey ideology as a side-effect, but to destroy the minds which play host to them. Ancient cultures, plagued by these mind viruses, developed forms of cultural protection against them:

Monocultures, like a field of corn, are susceptible to infections, but genetically diverse cultures, like a prairie, are extremely robust. After a few thousand years, one new language developed - Hebrew - that possessed exceptional flexibility and power. The deuteronomists, a group of radical monotheists in the sixth and seventh centuries B.C., were the first to take advantage of it. They lived in a time of extreme nationalism and xenophobia, which made it easier for them to reject foreign ideas like Asherah worship. They formalized their old stories into the Torah and implanted within it a law that insured its propagation throughout history - a law that said, in effect, 'make an exact copy of me and read it every day.' And they encouraged a sort of informational hygiene, a belief in copying things strictly and taking great care with information, which as they understood, is potentially dangerous. They made data a controlled substance.


Information hygiene has developed a life beyond the pages of this book. [it's not the only concept to do so -- Snow Crash is also the book that inspired Google Earth]. It has a slighty creepy feel, but the principle is sound. The processes inside your head depend on what you put into it. So you should be careful about what you read, for example -- an idea, even one you consciously disagree with, will have mental side-effects.

You could take informational hygiene as an injunction not to read, say, racist or sexist rants. I'm not so bothered about that side of things; I believe you can reject such ideas more-or-less consciously.

Informational hygiene is more interesting to me in the context of the attention economy. Political, social and cultural developments are dictated not just by what people believe, but by how much time they spend talking and thinking about it.

If a European spends all her time reading about politics in America, for example, she'll end up feeling alienated and disempowered. She has few levers with which to change policy in another country, so learning in detail about it is a waste of intellectual and emotional effort. Better to learn about a topic she can affect, and the ways she can affect it.

Depressive hedonia: blast from (450 years in) the past

On depth of pleasure...something not all that apposite, but which has been rocking around in my mind, and so which I may as well expunge by copying here.

Here's Roger Ascham on Jane Grey, Anglicanism's favourite geeky teenage quasi-martyr:

I came to Brodegate in Lecetershire, to take my leave of that noble Lady JaneGrey, to whom I was exceeding much beholding. Her parents, the Duke and Duchess, with all the household Gentlemen and Gentlewomen were hunting in the Park: I found her in her Chamber, reading Phædon Platonis in Greek, and that with as much delight as some gentleman would read a merry tale in Bocase. After salutation, and duty done, with some other talk, I asked her why she would carry out such pastime in the Park? smiling she answered me: I know all their sport in the Park is but a shadow to that pleasure that I find in Plato: Alas good folk, they never felt what true pleasure meant.

More on depressive hedonia

Ian Bogost and his commentators have some interesting reactions to K-Punk's argument on 'depressive hedonia'. First, Ian connects it to the never-ending debate over 'hard' theory:

Yet, as Fisher points out, when students "want Nietzsche in the same way that they want a hamburger" they miss the fact that "the indigestibility is Nietzsche."


My answer here is probably to say that nothing is inherently worthwhile /because/ it is hard. It can perhaps, though, be good in spite of hardness, and the hardness (if measured in the depth of attention possible/required) can open a door oto stronger feeling/understanding.

Then there is an interesting comment about distraction as a defence mechanism. Of a student wearing headphones in class:

What if the student needed the headphones primarily as a type of anxiety management against the classroom, placing a symbolic barrier of sorts between himself and the room in which he was expected to participate with a degree of fluency, articulateness and incisiveness that, in this society, it's just as likely he would feel eminently unequal to. To me, the headphones seem much more a way to insulate one from the angst of socio-academic participation in than it is "to be denied, for a moment, the constant flow of sugary gratification on demand."


This, IMO, is also true as a much more general rule. The cycle of seeking new things, seeking short-term gratification or acceptance -- it's the result of insecurity. If you have the confidence of being surrounded by love and acceptance, you don't need by-the-minute demonstration thereof.

Incidentally, for reference, this is the post which formed the basis for that section of Capitalist Realism.

Zizek on capitalist realism

What I love about Zizek's blurb for Capitalist Realism is that you can so easiy imagine him exclaiming it vocally, complete with excited hand-gestures:

Let's not beat around the bush: Fisher's compulsively readable book is simply the best diagnosis of our predicament that we have! Through examples from daily life and popular culture, but without sacrificing theoretical stringency, he provides a ruthless portrait of our ideological misery. Although the book is written from a radically Left perspective, Fisher offers no easy solutions. Capitalist Realism is a sobering call for patient theoretical and political work. It enables us to breathe freely in our sticky atmosphere.

Love in a time of acceleration

Is love more powerful when it is harder to obtain? Rob Horning thinks so:

as dating (or ersatz love) has migrated to the internet, it has undergone the same changes as everything else that has moved online: it has been remade by the ethic of convenience into something more solipsistic and disposable.


But what online dating does terrifyingly well is to help people find partners who perfectly embody some desired template of personality. The end result is that you can find scarily close lovers.

Or that's my hunch, and one which I'm sure could be demonstrated in some quantitative way. Couldn't two lovers who are database-certified as perfect for one another attain a deeper level of intensity, compared to old-school partners, who have some reasons to love one another, but were mostly just in the same place at the right time?

Retreat

On a similar topic, the need for retreat:


I believe that teaching today, in all and any context, must involve the strategies of the psychoanalyst. That's how traumatizing our pleasure-culture has become, not by being pleasurable but by denying our ability to rest. I’m reminded of Zizek’s remarks on Lenin who withdrew to Switzerland in the dire times of 1915 to a kind of inner repose in which he read Hegel. When he re-emerged, it was with the refined capacity to strike at the heart of the matter.

[source]

I'd put this in the same context as Malcolm X's experience of studying in prison. In fact it's true of many revolutionary leaders, that they move from being jailed on political grounds, straight to leading a mass movement. I'd taken it as an impressive sign of strength of character -- but perhaps even the isolation of jail can provide something of value*.

See also this HN discussion of doing nothing for 2 minutes. And this is discussion from a high-energy technophile crowd, appreciating the value of stepping back from the cycle.


* to be clear, not trying to be rosy about this -- being locked up is a soul-destroying experience for most, even if there is occasionally a small silver lining.

depresive hedonia

I have a pretty decent idea of what kind of grumpy old man I'll become, should I live that long. Like some kind of postmodern atheist puritan, I'll start to becme vocally opposed to Fun. Or opposed to short-term pleasure, at least -- opposed to the capitalist agenda of momentary hedonism.

This kind of addictively shallow pleasure-seeking is closely linked to the constant availability of short-term stimulus. Here's how K-Punk describes it in Capitalist Realism:

"Many of the teenage students I encoutnered seemed to be in a state of what I would call depressive hedonia. Depression is usually characterized as a state of anhedonia, but the condition I'm referring to is constituted not by an inability to get pleasure so much as it is by an inability to do anything else _except_ pursue pleasure. There is a sense that 'something is missing' -- but no appreciation that this mysterious, missing enjoyment can only be accessed _beyond_ the pleasure principle"


This is a general social trend, but massively exacerbated by instantaneous new media and mobile communication, and in particular by the commercial interests built around them. In a world of constant, instant news, the economy of attention is built around addiction.

It's barely a stretch to claim that this is taking its place alongside the better-known socio-cultural distortions which have shaped the world up to now. Planned obsolescence, advertising-fuelled inflation of gigantist consumerist desires -- these continue, but news-addiction takes its place alongside them as a market distortion of desire.

It's a particular problem when combined with 'walled gardens', which give one corporation control over the mechanisms of communication, and power to unilaterally change the terms of conversation. We need some kind of 'escape gardening', a set of technical innovations and social practices which would let us engage with communities in such closed platforms, while building ways to guide people out of them into the open web, or into interpersonal relationships not mediated by blinkenlights.

Addiction-seeking mechanisms and walled gardens can exist independently, of course, but the latter provides a strong commercial incentive to generate the former.

There are ways out of this situation. But they all require consciously stepping off the hedonic treadmill, and accepting stress and misery on the path towards doing something. There's no shortage of models for this. Any number of classical philsophical schools, many religious teachings. Walden, and other forms of intentional simplicity. Romanticism, emphasising the intensity of feeling over its quantity or pleasantness. The Aesthetic movement, and the idea of the Lebenskunstler.

But to reach them we need, not necessarily a deceleration, but a willingness to exist in the absence of stimulation.

As you may guess, much of this post comes from my personal frustration at a work-style which requires me to be constantly plugged in, but which hasn't yet helped me achieve any human closeness or intensity of feeling

tw :yes

Nostalgia, atemporality and music blogging

Simon Reynolds: how do you write about music when the volume of creation is unmanageably large? You give up on criticism, give up on finding something Significant. Instead, you just churn out excited brief notes on whatever track has dropped into your feed in the last 5 minutes.

That's what Pitchfork are doing with their offshoot Altered Zones. 15 bloggers post prolifically "with a sensibility that could be fairly described as post-critical". Because, says Reynolds, "there's just too much [music], and that filtering doesn't seem to be quite the thing to do with it"

So far, so typically net/ADHD/affect-driven. More interesting is the implied link between this cultural surplus and a culture of nostalgia.

"Everybody knows" that we're drowning in nostalgia. But our nostalgia has two distinct patterns, one transitional, the other here to stay. The first is our parent's nostalgia -- the mainstream, modernist-nationalist TV nostalgia of "remember the 80s" shows. This variant functions as a stand-in for the mass culture of the past, a nicotine patch for modernism. It conjures up a feeling of experiencing the same media alongside your neighbours, friends and enemies. Since that shared culture no longer exists in the present, it's transposed into the past.

So that form of mass-culture nostalgia is a transition phenomenon: it'll vanish as there are no longer generations growing up with mass-culture upbringing. "Remember the 90s" is already strugging; "Remember the noughties" perhaps won't function at all.

But the 'nostalgia' currently riding high in music is something else entirely. It's "ahistorical omnivorousness":

I don't think [it] really has much to do with all the '80s ghosts haunting this music. From YouTube to sharity blogs, the Internet is an ever-expanding data sea, and these young musicians are really explorers, voyaging into the past and diving for pearls.


Bruce Sterling covered this last year in a speech at the Transmediale digital art festival in Berlin:

So how do we just — like — sound out our new scene? What can we do to liven things up, especially as creative artists?

Well, the immediate impulse is going to be the ‘Frankenstein Mashup.’ Because that’s the native expression of network culture. The “Frankenstein mashup” is to just take elements of past, present, and future and just collide ‘em together, in sort of a collage. More or less semi-randomly, like a Surrealist “exquisite corpse.”


tw: yes

Thursday, January 20, 2011

bp


Afghanistan. Still a war there, y'know.
And every time you look away for a while, the news gets steadily worse.

Here is a horrifying story of bombing a village into oblivion. But the writer is in total sympathy with the military, and doesn't understand how anybody could dislike their home being destroyed::

Mohammad [one of the villagers]...in a fit of theatrics had accused Flynn of ruining his life after the demolition
...
clearing operations are a necessary evil to weed out the Taliban, and they often leave devastating destruction in the wake. But [critics overlook] the tremendous effort some units, like 1-320th, have made to rebuild his country


There's been entirely justified outrage at wired and at Central Asia blog Registan

what is happening right now in Southern Afghanistan is inexcusable. There were rumors of this policy of collective punishment in the Arghandab before (see this overwrought Daily Mail story that stops right before the village actually was destroyed for an idea of what is going on), and I’m really struggling to see how such behavior does not violate Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention—that is, how this behavior is not a war crime, especially given the explicit admission that such behavior is merely for the convenience of the soldier and not any grander strategy or purpose.



I cannot comprehend why the deliberate destruction of villages seems to be an official, sanctioned ISAF policy in the South. Is is abhorrent, an atrocity, and there is no excuse for it (nor are there words for the anger it’s stirred in me, reading about it from afar; I suspect Broadwell would sniff at me to stop whining as well, were we to discuss it in person). This should outrage and infuriate everyone who reads about it. But, and this is where I move from rage to despair: how could we ever possibly hope to stop it?


Extra horror: read the comments on any of the posts above. They're all full of people defending the policy of blowing up villages for the good of the inhabitants.


Monday, January 17, 2011

Unsorted notes on

Robert Fisk
The Arabs used to say that two-thirds of the entire Tunisian population – seven million out of 10 million, virtually the whole adult population – worked in one way or another for Mr Ben Ali's secret police


[doh: so what kind of recrimination can they look forward to? Truth and reconciliation? Look at how stasi files are still and issue in Germany, 20 years on]

More Fisk
the "unity" government is to be formed by Mohamed Ghannouchi, a satrap of Mr Ben Ali's for almost 20 years, a safe pair of hands who will have our interests – rather than his people's interests – at heart.


Also: Amelia Andersdotter on the internet aspects. She also raises the prospect of Tunisia becoming a francophone outsourcing destination (not that there's a shortage of those

Justified boosterism

Sunday, January 16, 2011

John Samson

John Samson, a mostly-ignored documentary-maker active in the 70s:

In 1977 Samson made Dressing For Pleasure, a documentary about ordinary people who enjoyed dressing in rubber and who approached their fetish with a matter of factness that seems almost quaint. The film was an immediate sensation among British fashion designers and within the London punk scene and was promptly banned as a video nasty. It ended becoming one of the most ripped off British films of the 1970s.


weakness of EU response to Tunisia

Criticism

Left-wing, liberal and Green MEPs however have expressed their dismay at a "delayed" and "weak" response to the killings by foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton.

Emelie Doromzee, of the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network, told EUobserver that the EU should suspend its talks with the government and more strongly condemn the regime's actions: "Until now, the language has been so far from what one would expect and sees elsewhere. The EU has put out a very weak statement. It's past the stage of written statements. It's almost a month now that these protests have been going on. We need concrete actions from the EU."

dictatorship air miles

The Guardian on the wife of the ousted president:

The former hairdresser and her extended family had a grip on business, construction and foreign investment, living a lifestyle so lavish they would fly in food from other continents for parties.


What's hilarious is how this excess is something the supermarkets achieve constantly for European consumers. Just with much greater efficiency.



Saturday, January 15, 2011

Government consultants working for free

City firms are doing government work for free in the hope of getting future contracts when times are easier and the public aren't looking:

On one recent government contract five contractors all bid to undertake the work for £1, he said. But Downey also acknowledged that there was a degree of self-interest on the part of firms, which are expecting a resurgence of consultancy in government in the near future.


It's like medieval nobles showering the king with gifts, knowing he'll repay them ten times over with other people's possessions.


Catherine Ashton's attendance record

I never liked the idea of Baroness Ashton running EU foreign policy.

Now blogger and Telegraph journalist Bruno Waterfield is gunning for over her invisibility during her first year in place:

Lady Ashton does not possess the political nous or commitment of an elected politician. Apart from one or two months last year, she has shown herself to be unwilling to travel or work over weekends. Working Monday to Friday might be fine for a jobsworth public official or serial quango/Lords appointee but it’s not good enough for an EU foreign minister. People who want to change the world have to give up prosaic ideas like the work/life balance.


And here's Ronny Patz:

when you are in Brussels, a lot of people complain about the way EU “foreign minister” Ashton works....
I doubt that with her limited amount of involvement into the core Commission work (represented through her participation record) she really was having her voice heard

Spider jerusalem confronts death

Spider Jerusalem, faced with impending death:



Posting from vim

A while ago, I got excited about posting to this blog from vim. Then I upgraded things, got distracted, forgot about it, and it seems now _not to work_

easiest way I can find is to save the text into a new file, then do:

google blogger post --title "Posting from vim" --tags "technology, vim,google,howto" %


Mating: curious love

I'm loving Mating, albeit in a slightly guilty way -- it tweaks a few of my traits a bit too precisely, with not enough outside-world to make it seem harmless. p. 261-2:

A thing that corrupts N's worldview is his own demonic energy, whyich is what socalled greatness may in fact reduce to. He's unnatural. He can work six hours flagstoning or paving, scabs of cement stuck all over hi body, a bite to eat, into the bathing engine, and he's all set to work late into the night reading and writing and using his abacus.


Friday, January 14, 2011

Maybe Maimed: prejudice is the media equivalent of pollution. I agree with this, and it goes far beyond porn:
Porn companies are companies, and they have a product. What makes their product different from, say, a steel mill or a coal mine is that their product is largely cultural, not material. They operate in a completely different arena; they do not have to deal with resource scarcity or distribution in the same way, for example. But this does not mean they do not pollute. They do. Kink, Inc. is a massive polluter.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Historical rhetoric of the left is, as a rule, a thousand times better than the current stuff. Even when it's basically content-free. Jim Cannon, via Ken MacLeod

That is the realistic perspective of our great movement. We ourselves are not privileged to live in the socialist society of the future, which Jack London, in his far-reaching aspiration, called the Golden Future. It is our destiny, here and now, to live in the time of the decay and death agony of capitalism. It is our task to wade through the blood and filth of this outmoded, dying system. Our mission is to clear it away. That is our struggle, our law of life.
Here is a potential project for the weekend:

If you subscribe to the NYT's RSS feeds, you can actually watch the headlines evolve as the story is updated throughout the day. It's really quite interesting, though I've never seen one specifically de-sexualized.

Monday, January 10, 2011

Cibelle

I'm not entirely convinced by Bruce Sterling's love of Cibelle. He says of the 'Abravanista' movement around her:

So the Abravanista crowd are a kind of "oh fuck off" counterculture who have gone into a vibrant, post-traumatic creative scene. It's this air of surreal nihilism that puts some iron in their bones. It's why I take them seriously and consider them global-scale trend-setters as an art movement.


Also entertaining is that she's very firm about being based in Dalston -- in the same way as artists of other generations might emphasise being in the Castro, or the Greenwich Village, or the Left Bank. Queue laughter from all my father's generation
Have been reading posts by/about refugees, asylum seekers and other migrants. There's some great stuff out there; the one constant seems to be black humour

Mo says when we can finally work his friend can get me a job in McDonald’s. I’ll remember to wear a suit for the interview. Why don’t you go for the job, I say. It’ll take your mind off the goat. He looks at me angrily and leaves.

4:30 p.m. It turns out the goat was a decoy for worse news. Apparently Mo’s great aunt has testicular cancer. An incorrect translation, I hope.

5 p.m. Back in the room I try to cheer Mo up by reminding him he is twenty years younger than me and has a great future. But I am not sure he appreciated me as a gauge for his achievements. After all, the boy has dreams. Maybe one day he’ll make it to Hollywood. They are always looking to fill those crowd scenes.

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Charming introduction to Theodore Zeldin's books of French history:
Zeldin's approach can be understood as a kind of historical ethnography, while Todd's approach emphasizes processes and structures of nation formation.


What's striking is how out-of-place Zeldin's work must be in contemporary academic history -- but equally, how it's the kind of history people really want to write, and to read. I'm becoming increasingly sympathetic to the idea of some kind of revival of 19th century humanities, with the diligence and the emotional involvement. I'm not sure if you can manage that without the racism and shallowness -- though is it really better to have your prejudices concealed behind dull prose and academic walls?

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Create harder, or the sunspots will get you

The Sekhmet Hypothesis is the idea that pop-culture upheavals follow sunspot patterns. Every 11 years the sunspots hit a peak, and so there's a culture shift. If you squint really hard you can kind of see it. Warren Ellis:
1955 -- the dawn of rock'n'roll. 1966 00 is when the Sixties happened. 1977 --- punk epxlodes. 1988 -- aciiiid. 1999 -- fucking nothing.


So, we're now in a cultural rut which even bizarre sunspot theories can't extricate us from. Ellis again:


here in the Zero Years of the 21, even those most reliable engines of creation of the last half of C20, Britain and Japan (both islands, both post-imperialist, both post-major and incredibly damaged economic shell games, both finding their stations as makers of art) are coming up empty. Coldplay and Fruits Basket? Give me strength.

It's a chilling thought, but maybe worth considering, even only as a Threat Condition to be armed against: maybe we're stuck here.


[compare: the post-temporality Bruce Sterling has been turning into a theme, e.g. in his transmediale keynote last year]

Friday, January 7, 2011

Adam Curtis, Behaviorism and Behavioral Economics

Adam Curtis has a blog

Curtis is IMO the most interesting documentary-maker currently active, by a healthy margin. He spends months or years closeted in the BBC archives, intermittently emerging with documentaries like The Trap or The Power of Nightmares.

Most of his documentaries fit into a coherent project, an intellectual history of the 20th century. What continually fascinates him is the interaction between emotions and politics, how ideas about human nature shape how we see ourselves, and so form the background assumptions which justify political movements. As he told Charlie Brooker:

"What I'm hoping they'll do is pull back like in a helicopter and look at themselves and think about how they're a product of history, and of power, and politics, as much as a product of their own little inner desires. We're all part of a big historical age. That's just what we are. And, sometimes, we forget."


The blog extends these themes, often accompanied by decades-old clips which might otherwise never have found there way online.

Here is a typically fascinating post. Curtis takes Behavioural Economics -- popularised in 'Nudge' and by Dan Ariely, now being politically weaponized by Cameron's Behavioural Insight Unit -- and ties it to Behavoiurism. This is the psychological apporoach* of treating the mind as a black box, not trying to understand it internally but just tracking how it responds to certain stimuli. Curtis:


Drawing on... behaviourist ideas [Nudge author] Thaler wrote a paper in 1981 with a great title - An Economic Theory of Self-Control.

This is what lies behind the Downing Street unit's plans to find mechanisms to manipulate people so they will do "good" things - like save more for retirement or eat less bad food.

Skinner himself was acutely aware that modifying human behaviour in these ways raises serious political questions. Not just about individual freedom, but about who decides what is "good" behaviour, and what happens when others decide it is bad.

These are questions that the Nudge enthusiasts seem to be blithely unaware of.


The whole blog is fascinating, and is at the very least full of arguements to interestingly disagree with. I'm a fan.

* 'approach' because it hovers uneasily between being a methodological practice of conducting experiments and a theory of how the mind works. It's comparable to the 'homo economicus' model of rational self-interest in economics. Both are trivially true, but only if you sideline some of the most important causes of behaviour. Both function very well in narrow circumstances which make for good journal articles, tempting researchers to focus on those circumstances and ignore the rest. Both thus had a similar academic trajectory -- innumerable grad students applying the theories in ways that were clever, internally consistent, and applied to the real world only if you ignored the footnotes -- attacked continually by outsiders determined to blame the theory for the shortcomings of its application.
Sterling:
The monkeys in our heads are rattled, they're bouncing and swinging
out of control. Streams of thought block awareness of the moment. We're
somnambulists in a world of persistent dreams that are not necessarily
our own. The voices in our heads are not inherently our own, and not
inherently friendly. And there are so many of them.
Marina Abroamovic:

The underlying question in all of this is, of course: why? Why put yourself though such suffering in the name of art? Abramovic has no easy answers to that question. "I am obsessive always, even as a child," she says, suddenly serious, and, for the first time, pausing for thought. "On one side is this strict orthodox religion, on the other is communism, and I am this little girl pulled between the two. It makes me who I am. It turns me into the kind of person that Freud would have a field day with, for sure." She hoots with laughter again and reaches for the English tea.
...
"The brother of my grandfather was the patriarch of the Orthodox Church and revered as a saint. So everything in my childhood is about total sacrifice, whether to religion or to communism. This is what is engraved on me. This is why I have this insane willpower. My body is now beginning to be falling apart, but I will do it to the end. I don't care. With me it is about whatever it takes."


compare: the Hunger Artist, Ashley Z's 'private performance', pornography
Frothing Lunatics
Now, when I first read this article I made a prediction to myself: this will be circulating among the mideast's frothing lunatics for DECADES. This is standard. The frothing lunatics in any society seize upon the statements of the frothing lunatics on the other "side," and scream incesssantly that these statements represent actual plans with actual power behind them.

GEORGE BUSH: If we don't stop them, Al Qaeda will create a caliphate across the mideast! After all, that's what Ayman Zawahiri said they'll do!

OSAMA BIN LADEN: If we don't stop them, the crusaders will invade our countries, kill our leaders, and convert us to Christianity! After all, that's what Ann Coulter said they'll do!

One amusing results of this is the statements by one side's frothing lunatics are sometimes far better known in other countries than their own. (E.g, that specific burst of Coulter's insanity may well be spoken of more often in Saudi Arabia than it is here.)

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Conscript geeks of estonia

Estonia Considers a Nerd Draft to Staff Cyber Army - Techland - TIME.com
Cyber Defense League, a specialty military unit of IT volunteers that would help fend off similar future cyberassaults.

(More on Techland: 9 Online Scams & Cyber Assaults To Watch Out For In 2011)

The league, made up of a group of Estonian programmers, computer scientists and software engineers would be the country's main leg of defense in the event of a second cyberwar, but an all-volunteer unit may not pack enough nerdpower for confident security. Instead, Estonian officials are considering a draft among the country's IT work force, Defense Minister Jaak Aaviksoo told NPR this week. "We are thinking of introducing this conscript service, a cyber service," Aaviksoo said. "This is an idea that we've been playing around [with]. We don't have the mechanism or laws in place, but it might be one option."
Somewhat surprised that I've yet to encounter a gay bar, or similar, called the Large Hardon Collider. Too much spontaneous sniggering at the time, insufficient organization to solidify and institutionalise the bad jokes
All great facts and personages appear twice: the first time as a hit, the second time as the cover band. Jonl
A couple of weeks ago I saw The Eggmen, a Beatles cover band here in Austin, perform "I Am the Walrus" with strings, every note in place, and I thought how much of life is like being in a cover band, trying to hit the right notes, make that perfect replication of what went before.


Europe: Not just boring, but old:


Now the Europeans really do seem to be acting old -- not
delusionary and bewildered, like the USA, but elderly, crotchety. Bent
over their knitting.

Without Americans and Soviets around to boss and screech at
them, the Europeans are obsessed with immigration and internal
minorities. It's all about the lazy, job-stealing Polish plumber or
the North African guy next door who killed a goat in his bathtub....

Obviously immigration is a big deal for small, relatively homogenous
societies with big language and heritage issues. But something about
this pervasive anxiety really makes contemporary Europeans seem feeble
and small-minded. These used to be massive, globe-spanning,
imperial states. Even in the Cold War, they were at least the major
pieces on the planetary chessboard. Now you can ask what the glorious
European Project is about, and it's mostly about a cushy retirement
for what's left of their managerial class. Europe's younger generation
is getting one of the rawest deals you can imagine.
Adam Curtis, via Charlie Brooker:
"What I'm hoping they'll do is pull back like in a helicopter and look at themselves and think about how they're a product of history, and of power, and politics, as much as a product of their own little inner desires. We're all part of a big historical age. That's just what we are. And, sometimes, we forget."

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

think-tank policy laundering

The Asia Times has a two-part article by Michael Flynn on the military-media complex.

He takes the surge as an example of military policy-laundering. As Petraeus said: "far more important than the surge of 30,000 additional US troops was the surge of ideas that helped us to employ those troops". Laundering (not Flynn's term) because the policies originate from the military, but need the imprimateur of the think-tanks to win over the administration:

"Petraeus knew that the [George W] Bush administration's credibility was low, that it was going to have trouble selling the surge," said Finel in an interview, so he hand-picked a number of civilians who he knew were behind this policy and helped turn them into media "experts". This effort sidelined critics of the surge, says Finel, who were viewed as "outsiders, people without access, and thus not to be believed".


It's a bit like the classic consulting scenario. The managers know what policy they want to introduce, but don't have the authority to impose it themselves. So they hire external consultants, who (knowing which side their bread is buttered) produce glossy reports in favour of the policy. This enables the managers who hired them to win over other power centres within the corporation. Replace corporate factions with branches of governments, consultants with think-tanks, and the comparison is pretty exact.

One difference is how the public sphere gets twisted about as result. Since the media's capacity for independent analysis has withered away, it is vulnerable to being contorted by such internal power-plays. In the absence of journalists with the time, competence or inclination to compare stories to reality, "all that is solid melts into PR" [k-punk]. We lack the resources to figure out. We're left in Plato's cave, sharing at the shadow-play as pundits talk to pundits, unequipped to glance at the real world outside.

This isn't unique to the military. So many small inofficially-political groups are funded by the EU, DfiD and the like, I presume often with the (carefuly unstated) hope that they'll influence public debate.

But the military is bigger -- I recall reading that the Pentagon's PR budget is larger than the entire budget of the state department

state of the world

Bruce Sterling's state of the world: actually pretty dull so far. But he has form, and I have faith.
Incoming GOP House Chairs Plan to Investigate Climate Scientists, Probe Muslim "Radicalization," Repeal Healthcare Reform
REP. JOHN SHIMKUS: So I want to start with Genesis 8, verse 21 and 22. "Never again will I curse the ground because of man, even though every inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done. As long as the earth endures, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night will never cease." I believe that’s the infallible word of God, and that’s the way it’s going to be for His creation.

The Serpent

I recently discovered the Serpent. This is a musical instrument vaguely similar to a tuba, but developed in the late 16th century for the purposes of church music. The idea was apparently to create an instrument which sounds similar to a low male voice, so as to enhance the lower ranges of plainsong. Opinions on the instrument are mixed, to put it tactfully:


It is blown with a cup shaped mouthpiece which is very similar to that of a trombone or Euphonium/Baritone. Played softly, it has a firm yet mellow tone color, or timbre. At medium volume, it produces a robust sound which seems to be a cross between the tuba, the bassoon, and the French horn. When played loudly it can produce unpleasant noises reminiscent of large animals in distress. [source]


Over the past four centuries, other writers have been far nastier. And it sounds like a nightmare to play:

The Serpent really requires a totally unique approach and playing technique....Because it is not possible for the basic Serpent to be vented properly, the instrument does not conveniently resonate at the desired pitches the way modern wind instruments do....

Since the Serpent does not center accurately on most notes, the player must be able to 'sight sing' the music much like a singer must look at a given note and produce the correct pitch without mechanical assistance. Once the player has the specified pitch in mind, he must then produce the required vibration with his lips, forcing the instrument to go along even if it cannot actually resonate at that frequency.


There must, somewhere, be groups of people dedicated to playing the oddest of instruments. Ideally together.

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Nice to know that oil industry salaries are still enough to piss off people they're trying to do business with, even in Kazakhstan:
On ending the call, [Kazakh Vice-President] Idenov explained he was talking to British Gas (BG) Country Director for Kazakhstan Mark Rawlings who had missed the deadline to deliver a letter about arbitration on the Karachaganak super-giant oil-field project (reftel). Still clearly steamed, Idenov XXXXXXXXXXXX “I tell him, ‘Mark, stop being an idiot! Stop tempting fate! XXXXXXXXXXXX Idenov asked, “Do you know how much he (Rawlings) makes? $72,000 a month! A month!! Plus benefits! Plus bonuses! Lives in Switzerland but supposedly works in London. Comes here once a month to check in. Nice life, huh?”